Видео

That's an interesting take. Unusual, but interesting.

@@lanceobe6801 Elite being a far better game is your opinion. 4.0.1 has been running (for me) phenomenally well. It sounds like one of the unusual issues at the moment is that some people have some bugs and some people don’t, however with server meshing, there is currently 600 people or so to one server shard, while running at 25-30 server FPS. Before 4.0, it was 100 people, with most servers running at 10 or less. I’m seeing players at every station, every major system, and going in and out of the jump points to Pyro. In Elite, I barely saw anyone, even in the places that should be busy like Shinrarta Dezhra and Achenar.

Nope. Last played December 29th, 2022. Just played Star Citizen all night.

You may want to peek their funding and let me know if bankruptcy looks like it's even close.

@@thierrybo6304 The right choice for everyone? Maybe not. The right choice for me as a personal decision to make? Absolutely.

SC is not unplayable, its in a more playable state the ED will ever be and lightyears better then that joke called Starfield and unlike some people that base their rants on the rants of others, ive actually played them all to form my own opinion, yes ED is fun and i will still play it but SC is so much better in every way, Starfield on the other hand I will never play again.

@@sonnyankau9239 Tell me how Star Citizen is a scam. Convince me beyond reasonable doubt.

@@The9thDivine tell me a single other video game in history that's got nearly a billion in funding that didn't release after nearly a decade. it's okay that you've bought into it, but you will regret it when you get punched in the face by reality.

@@sonnyankau9239 So when I asked you to convince me why it's a scam, you tell me "well the funding and no release yet"? Not a great start so far but I'll let you continue.

@@The9thDivine wow this person is clueless.

@@sonnyankau9239 I got my first look at SC in 2014 just after a backed it and ive watched it grow since then, step by step, watching Chris and his team make this game out of nothing, they invented so many things to be able to implement mechanics into their game that would other wise be impossible they, they invented server meshing which other companies are also jumping onto to, which is a massive breakthrough for the open world game genre, everything in Star Citizen is made by the CIG team, its not taken from anywhere else and no other Space Sim has ever done that, and most likely never will because that comes from dedication to your players, in case you dont know yet, Chris Roberts, the guy who pretty much started this was one of the leads on Freelancer, one of the best Space games ever made, until microsoft made him leave because he wanted to much for the game and so the game stood for a year longer and had alot less in it then what it could have had, now Freelancer came out in 2003 and by todays standards it is still good in terms of gameplay and looks plus you can still play an MMO version of it to this day with more systems and more ships and its now called Discovery Freelancer, so Star Citizen is by no means a scam and Chris Roberts will never walk away from his own project and his fans.

you're hilarious, you probably also someone that will never have a car, because, what will that add? if you do then you probably have an automatic and the only thing you know about it is you need to give it some kind of fuel every now n then

@Reginald-Erasmus weird conclusion to come to. I drive a manual Evo X with an exedy heavy duty clutch. I've been modding cars and driving manuals practically since I got my licence. My profile picture is an Evo V because the last car I owned was an Evo V. Dumb assumption to have made 😂 Edit: Your pfp looks to be a Ninja 600 (hard to tell on a 50x50 inage of the front end from a distance). I used to own a ZX2R which I replaced the idler cable, clutch cable, headers, and various other parts including rebuilding the brakes. 😅

@@denizorsel1029 Allow me to correct you. Star Citizen is a *known alpha* game by anyone who plays it. The “rant about ED feeling like a beta” didn’t occur, as I am only referring to a single DLC that was *advertised* to hell and high water as a feature packed and fully functioning product. And it was neither. I’ve also beaten the elevator boss every time I’ve faced him, on the hardest difficulty.

Elite servers are better? - how did that blockade event go a few days ago?.. we have 600 player servers in SC and the population to fill them without needing a coordinated event.. just log in

Explain how so.

SC used to earn Elite levels of revenue, before the 'scope creep'. We wanted it - and put our $ where our mouth is , which is why SC earns more PER YEAR than the entire 2012 to present day time line of elite dangerous. If SC has no business model, why do they earn more than StarField, EvE, Elite, No Mans Sky, X4 and ALL the other space games? ..why is Elite adopting SC's funding model? .. they want to get back to the good old days when they could afford 100 developers working on Elite. SC has 1,200+

@@reckacyde 30 minutes is a far over exaggeration. And still, I’d rather have some immersion, as opposed to Elite, where I *am* the ship itself. I’d much rather be the actual pilot of it instead.

@@reckacyde Huh? 😂

You're here, aren't you?

Sure, the game has had a few rough patches that do in fact fuck with stability. There is no arguing that. "Star Citizen isn't even playable." I could link you hundreds of videos and multiple Twitch channels, including my own, that show the game is very playable.

@@IndigoSun-hz6cq I have tried SC for five years, and it doesn’t cost a mortgage. $45 for a game package. Spend a little more if you want, and don’t if you don’t want. It’s pretty easy not to.

@@The9thDivine The business model of nearly a BILLION dollars in ship sales suggest otherwise.

​@@IndigoSun-hz6cq There are 5.5 *million* backers. Not 5.5 million high end ship buyers, but total game package owners, no matter which ship they bought to start with. The $1 billion mark likely won't hit until 2027, after the release of Squadron 42 in 2026.

@@The9thDivine Honestly, I've heard all the metric justifications over the years. The business model is absolutely based on the continuance of the status quo. The moment they complete, revenue stops, when even mediocre players can grind a capital ship because there are no more resets CIG' income flops. Sure, sales from tinsel etc.

@@The9thDivine lol, 2 years, we really have heard that before!

@@MrPersonatus I still heavily enjoy it, probably even more so than at the time of this video. Sure the game has a lot of bugs with different things but bugs occur in every game.

@@LastSurvivour I can’t show you something that’s not in the game yet, can I?

@@The9thDivine then you cannot compalin of it in comparing the two games like another game has it.

@ I absolutely can, but I also never said that Star Citizen had it. It was FDev who *originally said* that it was something they had planned for in Elite, not Star Citizen.

Ah yes, the "if you tell anyone you like something, you must be on company payroll" comment. If any entity pays me to talk about something, I am legally required to make that known to my audience. This includes FTC 15 U.S.C. §§ 41-58, the AVMSD under the European Union, and the CAP Code in the United Kingdom, just to name a few.

Yea, The sense of scale that Elite Dangerous gives me, especially in VR is amazing. Even just looking around the cockpit in VR makes the ship feel huge. Seeing planets and suns grow in my vision as I get closer. The best video that describes how good it is this: Elite Dangerous VR is a Nightmare ruclips.net/video/Fa0b2Kd2xhU/видео.htmlsi=SnxtvOl21O4hQtYW And this video is pretty good but describes how, yet again, the ED devs don't care about the players. ruclips.net/video/0tHKx3-N6EM/видео.htmlsi=8Y3cMSupalCN-4ME

@@Wendar96 This comment is constantly regurgitated. Tell me why I’ve been scammed. Beyond that, convince me.

@@The9thDivine 10 years of development, and we still get only 2 star systems (promised 100), core mechanics still not ready or work (99% game bugged). Wipes every patch, only pledgestore only hardcore. Fakes about engine techs. Outdated graphics (just land on random point of planet or moon and look around) and all poorly thought out game mechanics. Game engine very bad and too outdated. Ships quickly become obsolete and are not thought through for future (like coni or reclaimer) 700kkk gamedev lol. Scam Citizen

@@Wendar96 "Wipes every patch" - Although wipes do occur for major patches, this would still be incorrect. If periodic progression wipes somehow mean that a game is a scam, take a look at Escape from Tarkov. "Core mechanics still not ready or work" - 99% bugged is a *far* stretch to declare a game is a scam. The most you could be referencing here in terms of 'core mechanics' would be some issues with character customization, repairing and refueling, and perhaps some combat mechanics and physics. That's not 99%. "Only pledgestore, only hardcore" - A game package is $45 for a starter ship and the game. You are not forced to spend any more money on the game than you want to. "Outdated graphics" - Are we playing the same game? "Game engine very bad and too outdated" - You do realize that game engines are constantly being updated, especially StarEngine? "Ships become quickly obsolete" - Ships don't technically become 'obsolete'. Newer ships or technologies come with more advanced features, functionality, or better design. They might feel "out of place" but I'd consider it more vintage or nostalgic appear for those ships because they old a place with their original design, purpose, or fanbase. The funding for Star Citizen has been divvied between it, and the single player story game, Squadron 42. S42 has been feature complete for a year and is expected to release (per CIG) in 2026.

@@The9thDivine Escape from Tarkov - this is a game, it has not been developed for 10 years and has not collected 700kkk donations, having a minimum of content. Since 2013, I can’t even play for 30 minutes without every element of game breaking. The ship from $45 package can't do anything. Yes, again, just land on random plase on planet and you see 10 yesrs of development. I cant put url link to screenshots here, unfortunately. There is no StarEngine, this is CryEngine which was also called Lumberyard lol. This is an outdated engine, with outdated shaders and all other, which cannot cope with the scale they make. Just look at Freelancher for another example. The ship was not thought out at all, it was created according to old design rules, and still not updated. Like Constelation, like Reclaimer and etc etc and again etc. Yeah, of course it will. The core of the engine and the games are completely unprepared and look terrible, unoptimized, buggy, and uncomfortable.

@ Star Citizen is also a game. If you can’t play for 30 minutes, I’m curious about “every element breaking”. A $45 package gives you a ship and the game. That’s literally all you need to *play the game.* It is StarEngine. Heavily modified from CryEngine, but they are not the same. And yet, still not outdated.

I *never* say that throwing more money into the game "makes it better." Specifically, I said that my contribution *helps* the game, because it does. It seems that I constantly have to remind people that funding for Star Citizen is divvied between it, and Squadron 42, with S42 likely taking more priority, that of which is feature complete as of 2023, and per CIG, is expected to release 2026.